We believe you should go for BlueStacks if you are looking for the best power and performance for playing Android games on your PC or Mac. Memu pulled all its weight, but still, its CPU usage was 37% higher. Nox consumed 37% more CPU resources with a noticeable lag in-app performance. LDPlayer registered a massive 145% higher CPU usage. Is BlueStacks or NOX better?Įfficient CPU Consumption BlueStacks 5 outshined all the emulators, consuming about 10% CPU. One good thing about this emulator is that its system requirement is very low because to run this emulator your PC must have 2GB of RAM and 36GB of free space. LD Player is a lightweight Android emulator. Bluestacks 5 (Popular) Minimum Spec Bluestacks 5 OS Windows 7 up CPU Intel/AMD processor GPU OpenGL 3.0 up RAM 4GB RAM. Which is faster Android emulator?Īs We has stated above, the choice of the lightest and fastest Android emulator below can be aimed at ordinary users or gamers to play Android games.1. Despite the difference in size and memory requirement, Nox still packs in some of BlueStacks’ niftiest features. Is NOX lighter than BlueStacks?įeatures of Nox Nox is a lot lighter compared to BlueStacks – 100 MB lighter to be exact. Gameloop (Tencent Gaming Buddy) Android Studio. BlueStacks is undoubtedly one of the best Android emulators that you can find on Windows. List of Best Android Emulators for Windows 10 BlueStacks. What is the smoothest Android emulator?ġ0+ BEST Android Emulators For PC And MAC Comparison Of Top 5 Android Emulators For PC And MAC. If your computer is not very powerful, you might want to check out Ko Player, or Droid4X.

If your computer is average in its performance, we would recommend that you try out BlueStacks or MeMu Play. If you have a powerful computer with lots of RAM and processing power, the best options for you would be NoxPlayer. What is the least laggy Android emulator? What is the smoothest Android emulator?.What is the least laggy Android emulator?.

Is ldplayer better than bluestacks